[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+1E3rLzwkqwn09mzi7-112ZYyBU_mU_9Nszb0=aymm3H2sGpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 23:16:55 +0530
From: Kanchan Joshi <joshiiitr@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Selvakumar S <selvakuma.s1@...sung.com>,
Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>,
Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] concurrency handling for zoned null-blk
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:42 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:25:48PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> > Changes since v1:
> > - applied the refactoring suggested by Damien
> >
> > Kanchan Joshi (1):
> > null_blk: synchronization fix for zoned device
> >
> > drivers/block/null_blk.h | 1 +
> > drivers/block/null_blk_zoned.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
>
> <formletter>
>
> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> stable kernel tree. Please read:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> for how to do this properly.
>
> </formletter>
I'm sorry for the goof-up, Greg.
--
Joshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists