linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] concurrency handling for zoned null-blk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200928121136.GA661041@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:11:36 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, Damien.LeMoal@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, selvakuma.s1@...sung.com,
        nj.shetty@...sung.com, javier.gonz@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] concurrency handling for zoned null-blk

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:25:48PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> Changes since v1:
> - applied the refactoring suggested by Damien
> 
> Kanchan Joshi (1):
>   null_blk: synchronization fix for zoned device
> 
>  drivers/block/null_blk.h       |  1 +
>  drivers/block/null_blk_zoned.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 


<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>