[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VqkgWTrGLrUMdBWGD8_wd4yMr+e6U-xCxFg4B2LfhTRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:12:46 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
LinusW <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Srinivas Rao L <lsrao@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] genirq/PM: Introduce IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND
flag
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 9:32 PM Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> An interrupt that is disabled/masked but set for wakeup still needs to
> be able to wake up the system from sleep states like "suspend to RAM".
>
> This change introduces IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND flag. If irqchip
> have this flag set then irq PM will enable/unmask irqs that are marked
> for wakeup but are in disabled state.
>
> On resume such irqs will be restored back to disabled state.
>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> include/linux/irq.h | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> kernel/irq/debugfs.c | 3 +++
> kernel/irq/pm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
I will freely admit not being an expert on this code / knowing all the
subtle edge conditions, but this seems reasonable to me.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists