[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zh58ibgf.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:18:08 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
maz@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
evgreen@...omium.org, mka@...omium.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
jason@...edaemon.net, dianders@...omium.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
ilina@...eaurora.org, lsrao@...eaurora.org,
Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] genirq/PM: Introduce IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND flag
On Mon, Sep 28 2020 at 10:02, Maulik Shah wrote:
> An interrupt that is disabled/masked but set for wakeup still needs to
> be able to wake up the system from sleep states like "suspend to RAM".
>
> This change introduces IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND flag. If
> irqchip
s/This change introduces/Introduce/
git grep 'This patch' Documentation/process/
> have this flag set then irq PM will enable/unmask irqs that are marked
> for wakeup but are in disabled state.
>
> On resume such irqs will be restored back to disabled state.
>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
I assume Marc will pick that lot up. So:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists