[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB496062A92DF661738F274A7292350@VI1PR04MB4960.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:10:58 +0000
From: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: "sudeep.dutt@...el.com" <sudeep.dutt@...el.com>,
"ashutosh.dixit@...el.com" <ashutosh.dixit@...el.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"wang.yi59@....com.cn" <wang.yi59@....com.cn>,
"huang.zijiang@....com.cn" <huang.zijiang@....com.cn>,
"rikard.falkeborn@...il.com" <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] misc: vop: change the way of allocating vring for
noncoherent platform
Hi Christoph,
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 07:58:29AM +0000, Sherry Sun wrote:
> > Thanks for your reply.
> > Can you explain why we cannot use the API and header above in drivers?
> > And do you know if there are any APIs that could replace this to check the
> device hardware dma coherent support?
>
> If your treat the memory as if it is coherent with device access you should
> always use dma_alloc_coherent. The whole point of the DMA API is to
> abstract such differences away.
Well, for vring and device pages in vop driver, dma coherent memory maybe more reasonable.
Will use dma_alloc_coherent to replace the orginal memory allocate method in V2.
>
> > >
> > > > + vdev->vvr[i].vrh.vring.used =
> > > > + (void __force *)vpdev->hw_ops->remap(
> > >
> > > And you must not use __force casts without a comment explanation why
> > > they are safe.
> >
> > Here is the original code, I moved the original code into the if() without
> change it.
> > But I think this is because vpdev->hw_ops->remap() return type is void
> __iomem *, but vring.used need type void *.
> > Maybe this is a workaround for Intel MIC platform, as it reassigns the used
> ring on the EP side.
>
> Well, we'll need to figure out what is going on here, and blind casts to and
> from __iomem are dangerous.
Yes, you are right.
Regards
Sherry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists