linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] lib: string_helpers: provide kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200928125539.GI3956970@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 15:55:39 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] lib: string_helpers: provide kfree_strarray()

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:41:47PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> 
> There's a common pattern of dynamically allocating an array of char
> pointers and then also dynamically allocating each string in this
> array. Provide a helper for freeing such a string array with one call.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
But see below.

> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/string_helpers.h |  2 ++
>  lib/string_helpers.c           | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/string_helpers.h b/include/linux/string_helpers.h
> index 86f150c2a6b6..55b25120a1c6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/string_helpers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/string_helpers.h
> @@ -94,4 +94,6 @@ char *kstrdup_quotable(const char *src, gfp_t gfp);
>  char *kstrdup_quotable_cmdline(struct task_struct *task, gfp_t gfp);
>  char *kstrdup_quotable_file(struct file *file, gfp_t gfp);
>  
> +void kfree_strarray(char **str_array, size_t num_str);
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/lib/string_helpers.c b/lib/string_helpers.c
> index 963050c0283e..bfa4c9f3ca0a 100644
> --- a/lib/string_helpers.c
> +++ b/lib/string_helpers.c
> @@ -649,3 +649,28 @@ char *kstrdup_quotable_file(struct file *file, gfp_t gfp)
>  	return pathname;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kstrdup_quotable_file);
> +
> +/**
> + * kfree_strarray - free a number of dynamically allocated strings contained
> + *                  in an array and the array itself
> + *
> + * @str_array: Dynamically allocated array of strings to free. If NULL - the
> + *             function does nothing.
> + * @num_str: Number of strings (starting from the beginning of the array) to
> + *           free.
> + *
> + * Passing a non-null str_array and num_str == 0 as well as NULL str_array
> + * are valid use-cases.
> + */
> +void kfree_strarray(char **str_array, size_t num_str)

Hmm... I have missed your answer to 
 str_array -> array
 num_str -> n

The rationale behind dropping str is to avoid duplicates in the name of the
function and its parameters. 'array' is harder to avoid, but also possible,
though I leave it to you.

> +{
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	if (!str_array)
> +		return;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_str; i++)
> +		kfree(str_array[i]);
> +	kfree(str_array);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kfree_strarray);
> -- 
> 2.26.1
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko