[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200928130023.GJ3956970@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:00:23 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: mockup: pass the chip label as device
property
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:41:53PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> While we do check the "chip-name" property in probe(), we never actually
> use it. Let's pass the chip label to the driver using device properties
> as we'll want to allow users to define their own once dynamically
> created chips are supported.
>
> The property is renamed to "chip-label" to not cause any confusion with
> the actual chip name which is of the form: "gpiochipX".
>
> If the "chip-label" property is missing, let's do what most devices in
> drivers/gpio/ do and use dev_name().
...
> + snprintf(chip_label, sizeof(chip_label),
> + "gpio-mockup-%c", i + 'A');
> + properties[prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("chip-label",
> + chip_label);
You added new property, now count is up to 4. But at the same time
#define GPIO_MOCKUP_MAX_PROP 4
how do you avoid overflow?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists