[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200929074930.GG2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:49:30 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: quanyang.wang@...driver.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
a.darwish@...utronix.de,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] time/sched_clock: mark sched_clock_read_begin/retry
as notrace
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:50:51AM +0800, quanyang.wang@...driver.com wrote:
> From: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@...driver.com>
>
> Since sched_clock_read_begin and sched_clock_read_retry are called
> by notrace function sched_clock, they shouldn't be traceable either,
> or else ftrace_graph_caller will run into a dead loop on the path
> as below (arm for instance):
>
> ftrace_graph_caller
> prepare_ftrace_return
> function_graph_enter
> ftrace_push_return_trace
> trace_clock_local
> sched_clock
> sched_clock_read_begin/retry
>
> Fixes: 1b86abc1c645 ("sched_clock: Expose struct clock_read_data")
> Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@...driver.com>
> ---
> Changes:
> V2: Add notrace to sched_clock_read_retry according to Peter's suggestion.
>
> kernel/time/sched_clock.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
> index 1c03eec6ca9b..f629e3f5afbe 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
> @@ -68,13 +68,13 @@ static inline u64 notrace cyc_to_ns(u64 cyc, u32 mult, u32 shift)
> return (cyc * mult) >> shift;
> }
>
> -struct clock_read_data *sched_clock_read_begin(unsigned int *seq)
> +notrace struct clock_read_data *sched_clock_read_begin(unsigned int *seq)
> {
> *seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&cd.seq);
> return cd.read_data + (*seq & 1);
> }
>
> -int sched_clock_read_retry(unsigned int seq)
> +int notrace sched_clock_read_retry(unsigned int seq)
> {
> return read_seqcount_retry(&cd.seq, seq);
> }
You're inconsistent in the placement of notrace, I prefer the first, the
second read like notrace is the return type instead of a qualifier.
In any case,
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists