[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <459f3c42-4e18-0a71-fd84-122342bdb4fe@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:43:18 -0500
From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu,ftrace: Fix ftrace recursion
On 9/29/20 6:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Kim reported that perf-ftrace made his box unhappy. It turns out that
> commit:
>
> ff5c4f5cad33 ("rcu/tree: Mark the idle relevant functions noinstr")
>
> removed one too many notrace. Probably due to there not being a helpful
> comment.
>
> Reinstate the notrace and add a comment to avoid loosing it again.
>
> Fixes: ff5c4f5cad33 ("rcu/tree: Mark the idle relevant functions noinstr")
> Reported-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
Tested-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
Thanks,
Kim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists