[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v9fvglhm.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:36:37 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
megha.dey@...el.com, maz@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, jacob.jun.pan@...el.com,
ashok.raj@...el.com, jgg@...lanox.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com,
baolu.lu@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com, sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, jing.lin@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com, eric.auger@...hat.com, parav@...lanox.com,
jgg@...lanox.com, rafael@...nel.org, netanelg@...lanox.com,
shahafs@...lanox.com, yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, samuel.ortiz@...el.com, mona.hossain@...el.com
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/18] dmaengine: idxd: add interrupt handle request support
On Tue, Sep 15 2020 at 16:28, Dave Jiang wrote:
>
> +#define INT_HANDLE_IMS_TABLE 0x10000
> +int idxd_device_request_int_handle(struct idxd_device *idxd, int idx,
> + int *handle, enum idxd_interrupt_type irq_type)
New lines exist for a reason and this glued together define and function
definition is unreadable garbage.
Also is that magic bit a software flag or defined by hardware? If the
latter then you want to move it to the other hardware defines.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists