[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200930092313.6124a082@xhacker.debian>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:23:13 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...terjones.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Yue Wang <yue.wang@...ogic.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Xiaowei Song <songxiaowei@...ilicon.com>,
Binghui Wang <wangbinghui@...ilicon.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...s.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: dwc: Check alloc_page() return value
Hi Marc,
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 18:29:52 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-09-24 12:06, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > We need to check alloc_page() succeed or not before continuing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > index 0a19de946351..9e04e8ef3aa4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > @@ -303,6 +303,11 @@ void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> > u64 msi_target;
> >
> > pp->msi_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!pp->msi_page) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to alloc MSI page\n");
>
> A failing allocation will already scream, so there is no need to
> add insult to injury.
>
> More importantly, what is this MSI page ever used for? If I remember
> well, this is just a random address that never gets written to.
>
> So why do we allocate a page here? Why do we bother with this DMA
> mapping?
>
Ard and Rob also pointed out that there's no need to allocate a page, instead,
we could use an address in the driver data for MSI address. So I refactored
the patches and verified this solution works fine. Could you please review
the V5?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists