[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200930090252.GA9357@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:02:52 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:31:28PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> It's allocated with dma_alloc_wc, but then it's only accessed as
> non-coherent.
>
> Anyway, for the time being I guess you could revert 37054fc81443. But I
> have patches on top of it in drm-misc-next so it's going to be a mess.
>
> If we have time I can come up with a custom dumb_create() fonction, to make
> sure that the GEM buffers are allocated with dma_alloc_noncoherent(). Is
> there a dma_mmap_noncoherent() too?
Please use the lower-level dma_alloc_pages and then just insert the
pages directly using remap_pfn_range. Although it might make sense
to eventually create a wrapper around remap_pfn_range for all the
vma sizing sanity checks.
>
> -Paul
>
---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists