[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DB4HHQ.1KMN8GNWYJLC1@crapouillou.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:33:13 +0200
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
Hi Christoph,
Le mer. 30 sept. 2020 à 11:02, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> a écrit
:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:31:28PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> It's allocated with dma_alloc_wc, but then it's only accessed as
>> non-coherent.
>>
>> Anyway, for the time being I guess you could revert 37054fc81443.
>> But I
>> have patches on top of it in drm-misc-next so it's going to be a
>> mess.
>>
>> If we have time I can come up with a custom dumb_create() fonction,
>> to make
>> sure that the GEM buffers are allocated with
>> dma_alloc_noncoherent(). Is
>> there a dma_mmap_noncoherent() too?
>
> Please use the lower-level dma_alloc_pages and then just insert the
> pages directly using remap_pfn_range. Although it might make sense
> to eventually create a wrapper around remap_pfn_range for all the
> vma sizing sanity checks.
One thing missing for remap_pfn_range(), I have no alternative for this:
vma->vm_page_prot = dma_pgprot(dev, vma->vm_page_prot,
DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT);
So I have to do:
vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot);
pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) &= ~_CACHE_MASK;
pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) |= _CACHE_CACHABLE_NONCOHERENT;
And that will only compile on MIPS, because these _CACHE_* macros are
only defined there.
I would need something like a pgprot_noncoherent(), I think.
-Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists