[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200930235848.GD28786@gate.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:58:48 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
shuo.a.liu@...el.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Yu Wang <yu1.wang@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Yakui Zhao <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Fengwei Yin <fengwei.yin@...el.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/17] x86/acrn: Introduce hypercall interfaces
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:42:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Looks like yes. You can even check different GCC versions via the
> > dropdown in the top right.
>
> That only tells me it compiles it, not if that (IMO) weird construct is
> actually guaranteed to work as expected.
>
> I'd almost dive into the GCC archives to read the back-story to this
> 'feature', it just seems to weird to me. A well, for another day that.
It was documented in 1996 (<https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1f7febfcb10>), the
feature is older than that though.
In 2004 (in <https://gcc.gnu.org/g:805c33df1366>) the documentation for
this was made more explicit (it has been rewritten since, but it still
says the same thing).
Segher
Powered by blists - more mailing lists