linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] Introduce sendpage_ok() to detect misused sendpage in network related drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201001.124815.793423380665613978.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     colyli@...e.de
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, open-iscsi@...glegroups.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chaitanya.kulkarni@....com,
        cleech@...hat.com, hch@....de, amwang@...hat.com,
        eric.dumazet@...il.com, hare@...e.de, idryomov@...il.com,
        jack@...e.com, jlayton@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
        lduncan@...e.com, michaelc@...wisc.edu,
        mskorzhinskiy@...arflare.com, philipp.reisner@...bit.com,
        sagi@...mberg.me, vvs@...tuozzo.com, vbabka@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] Introduce sendpage_ok() to detect misused
 sendpage in network related drivers

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:43:45 -0700 (PDT)

> Series applied and queued up for -stable, thank you.

Actually, this doesn't even build:

In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:93,
                 from ./include/linux/bug.h:5,
                 from ./include/linux/mmdebug.h:5,
                 from ./include/linux/mm.h:9,
                 from net/socket.c:55:
net/socket.c: In function ‘kernel_sendpage’:
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:97:3: error: too few arguments to function ‘__warn_printk’
   97 |   __warn_printk(arg);     \
      |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~

Was this even build tested?