[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201001193937.GM28786@gate.crashing.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:39:37 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH next-20200930] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")
Hi!
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > So it looks like the best option is to exclude these
> > 2 files from conversion.
>
> Agreed. Nevertheless, is there any reason arch/powerpc/* should not be
> compiling cleanly with compiler.h? (CC'ing the rest of the PowerPC
> reviewers and ML).
You need to #include compiler_types.h to get this #define?
(The twice-defined thing is a warning, not an error. It should be fixed
of course, but it is less important; although it may be pointing to a
deeper problem.)
Segher
Powered by blists - more mailing lists