linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 01/12] fpga: fpga security manager class driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <baf8eec6-c89e-43fc-ab79-9bbc46acd208@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:07:00 -0700
From:   Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>
To:     Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc:     lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trix@...hat.com, lgoncalv@...hat.com,
        yilun.xu@...el.com, hao.wu@...el.com, matthew.gerlach@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/12] fpga: fpga security manager class driver


Hi Moritz,

On 9/30/20 5:31 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> I think providing the devm_ managed APIs is nicer, and makes it easier
> for the consumer of the API to do the right thing.

I see that the fpga_mgr code has support for two versions of the create()
and register() functions, one uses the devm_ approach, and the other does
not. Would also want to have two versions for the security manager?

- Russ