linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 01/12] fpga: fpga security manager class driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Oct 2020 12:07:53 -0700
From:   Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
To:     Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>
Cc:     Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        trix@...hat.com, lgoncalv@...hat.com, yilun.xu@...el.com,
        hao.wu@...el.com, matthew.gerlach@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/12] fpga: fpga security manager class driver

Hi Russ,

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 06:07:00PM -0700, Russ Weight wrote:
> 
> Hi Moritz,
> 
> On 9/30/20 5:31 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > I think providing the devm_ managed APIs is nicer, and makes it easier
> > for the consumer of the API to do the right thing.
> 
> I see that the fpga_mgr code has support for two versions of the create()
> and register() functions, one uses the devm_ approach, and the other does
> not. Would also want to have two versions for the security manager?

The devm_fpga_mgr_create() just wraps the other one. I think that's a
good way to handle it for now.

I'd keep the breakdown the same.

Cheers,
Moritz