[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201002151841.4ojt45mtcpkylvdq@treble>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 10:18:41 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] objtool: x86 instruction decoder and big
endian cross compiles
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 12:17:25AM +0200, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
>
> Currently objtool seems to be the only tool from build tools needed
> which breaks x86 cross compilation on big endian systems. Make the x86
> instruction decoder of the objtool usable on big endian machines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Since this changes the decoder (which is shared with the kernel), please
prefix the subject with "x86/insn:" instead of "objtool".
This patch is a bit ugly, but I don't necessarily have a better idea.
Masami?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists