linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 02/16] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201002151943.GB3159@nanopsycho.orion>
Date:   Fri, 2 Oct 2020 17:19:43 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/16] devlink: Add reload action option to
 devlink reload command

Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 03:59:05PM CEST, moshe@...lanox.com wrote:

[...]


>diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
>index 1c286e9a3590..ddba63bce7ad 100644
>--- a/include/net/devlink.h
>+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>@@ -1077,10 +1077,11 @@ struct devlink_ops {
> 	 * implemementation.
> 	 */
> 	u32 supported_flash_update_params;
>+	unsigned long reload_actions;
> 	int (*reload_down)(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
>-			   struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>-	int (*reload_up)(struct devlink *devlink,
>-			 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>+			   enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>+	int (*reload_up)(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
>+			 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed);

Nit. Could you please push extack to be the last arg here? It is common
to have extack as the last arg + action and actions_performed are going
to be side by side.

Otherwise the patch looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>