[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201003155726.GC1509449@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 17:57:26 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/15] usb: typec: tcpci: Add set_vbus tcpci callback
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 09:08:00AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Yes I tested it on usb-next before sending it out.
>
> 630 | tcpci->tcpc.enable_frs = tcpci_enable_frs;
>
> In https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-usb/list/?series=356837
> i.e v9 version of this series,
> Patch 7 i.e. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11804847/ is where the
> above line is added.
>
> I restested in combinations [1] [2] [3] [4]. All of them were clear
> cherry-picks. I didnt any merge conflicts.
>
> Maybe you are applying patches in a different order ?
I didn't think so. Can you try applying the patches, in order, and
building after each one to see if you get the same error or not?
My usb-next branch is up to date with all of the recent patches.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists