[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201003160713.GA1512229@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 18:07:13 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Sathish Narsimman <sathish.narasimman@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "Bluetooth: Update resolving list when updating
whitelist"
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 05:51:03PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> > This reverts commit 0eee35bdfa3b472cc986ecc6ad76293fdcda59e2 as it
> > breaks all bluetooth connections on my machine.
> >
> > Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
> > Cc: Sathish Narsimman <sathish.narasimman@...el.com>
> > Fixes: 0eee35bdfa3b ("Bluetooth: Update resolving list when updating whitelist")
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> > net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 41 ++-----------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> >
> > This has been bugging me for since 5.9-rc1, when all bluetooth devices
> > stopped working on my desktop system. I finally got the time to do
> > bisection today, and it came down to this patch. Reverting it on top of
> > 5.9-rc7 restored bluetooth devices and now my input devices properly
> > work.
> >
> > As it's almost 5.9-final, any chance this can be merged now to fix the
> > issue?
>
> can you be specific what breaks since our guys and I also think the
> ChromeOS guys have been testing these series of patches heavily.
My bluetooth trackball does not connect at all. With this reverted, it
all "just works".
Same I think for a Bluetooth headset, can check that again if you really
need me to, but the trackball is reliable here.
> When you run btmon does it indicate any errors?
How do I run it and where are the errors displayed?
> Do you have a chance to test net-next and see the LL Privacy there might have addressed this?
Have a specific set of patches I can test? It wouldn't be good to have
5.9-final go out with this not working at all.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists