[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03d465a6-f49d-8b83-8fed-111e9eb6e5c5@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 20:33:09 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
x86@...nel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/cpu/topology: Implement the CPU type sysfs
interface
On 10/2/20 6:17 PM, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> +u32 arch_get_cpu_type(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
> +
> + if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return c->x86_cpu_type;> +}
Hi,
Consider using
#include <linux/nospec.h>
and array_index_nospec() to avoid speculation problems on cpu_data.
cheers.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists