[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA420A99-C226-4A22-B3A6-4464DD8CFA1D@flygoat.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 14:25:42 +0800
From: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
CC: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
WANG Xuerui <git@...0n.name>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
<zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>,
afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Liangliang Huang <huanglllzu@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cevt-r4k: Enable intimer for Loongson64 CPUs with extimer
于 2020年10月2日 GMT+08:00 下午9:27:21, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> 写到:
>On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 07:02:54PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LOONGSON64
>> +static int c0_compare_int_enable(struct clock_event_device *cd)
>> +{
>> + if (cpu_has_extimer)
>> + set_c0_config6(LOONGSON_CONF6_INTIMER);
>
>why are you not simply do this in loognson64 board setup code and avoid
>the whole cluttering of #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LOONGSON64 over common code ?
Because I'm going to add extimer support later that require dynamic switch of cevt-r4k.
This callback is required.
Thanks.
- Jiaxun
>
>Thomas.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists