linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] leds: lm3697: Fix out-of-bound access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MIu53JH--3-2@tutanota.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Oct 2020 20:48:49 +0200 (CEST)
From:   ultracoolguy@...anota.com
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>, Dmurphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Marek Behun <kabel@...ckhole.sk>,
        Linux Leds <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: lm3697: Fix out-of-bound access

>No problem, sorry for breaking your patch. I moved it near other
initializers.

No problem :)

>Question: is it likely that someone will want to use your device with
-stable kernels? Should I mark this for -stable?

To be honest, it's unlikely that someone other than me is interested in my device on -stable. However, if you feel like the patch is simple enough to not cause any problem, then feel free to do so. 

Oct 5, 2020, 18:39 by pavel@....cz:

> On Mon 2020-10-05 20:31:16, ultracoolguy@...anota.com wrote:
>
>> Otherwise everything works great :)
>>
>> (And sorry for sending two emails)
>>
>
> No problem, sorry for breaking your patch. I moved it near other
> initializers.
>
> Question: is it likely that someone will want to use your device with
> -stable kernels? Should I mark this for -stable?
>
> Thanks and best regards,
>
>  Pavel
> -- 
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>