[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201005080612.GI5141@localhost>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:06:12 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@...lbox.org>
Cc: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: serial: qmi_wwan: add Cellient MPL200 card
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Wilken Gottwalt wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Oct 2020 17:29:38 +0200
> Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> wrote:
>
> > Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@...lbox.org> writes:
> >
> > > Add usb ids of the Cellient MPL200 card.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@...lbox.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/usb/qmi_wwan.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/qmi_wwan.c b/drivers/net/usb/qmi_wwan.c
> > > index 07c42c0719f5..0bf2b19d5d54 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/usb/qmi_wwan.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/qmi_wwan.c
> >
> > This is not a 'usb: serial' driver. Please resend with a less confusing
> > subject prefix.
> >
> > > @@ -1432,6 +1432,7 @@ static const struct usb_device_id products[] = {
> > > {QMI_GOBI_DEVICE(0x1199, 0x901b)}, /* Sierra Wireless MC7770 */
> > > {QMI_GOBI_DEVICE(0x12d1, 0x14f1)}, /* Sony Gobi 3000 Composite */
> > > {QMI_GOBI_DEVICE(0x1410, 0xa021)}, /* Foxconn Gobi 3000 Modem device (Novatel
> > > E396) */
> > > + {QMI_FIXED_INTF(0x2692, 0x9025, 4)}, /* Cellient MPL200 (rebranded Qualcomm
> > > 0x05c6) */
> > > { } /* END */
> > > };
> >
> >
> > This table is supposed to be organized by device type. The last section
> > is for Gobi2k and Gobi3k devices. Please try to put new devices into
> > the correct section.
>
> Oh sorry, looks like I got it mixed up a bit. It was my first attempt to submit
> a patch set. Which is the best way to resubmit an update if the other part of
> the patch set gets accepted? The documentation about re-/submitting patch sets
> is a bit thin.
Just send these as individual patches (not a series) as they are
independent and go through separate trees.
Also, I never received the USB serial patch, only this one, so you need
to resend both anyway.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists