linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: serial: qmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:19:44 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@...lbox.org>
Cc:     Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: serial: qmi_wwan: add Cellient MPL200 card

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:06:12AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Wilken Gottwalt wrote:

> > Oh sorry, looks like I got it mixed up a bit. It was my first attempt to submit
> > a patch set. Which is the best way to resubmit an update if the other part of
> > the patch set gets accepted? The documentation about re-/submitting patch sets
> > is a bit thin.
> 
> Just send these as individual patches (not a series) as they are
> independent and go through separate trees.
> 
> Also, I never received the USB serial patch, only this one, so you need
> to resend both anyway.

Found it flagged spam, so no need to resend that one.

Just resend the networking one with a v2 prefix. In general, you could
mention in a changelog in the cover letter that you've removed patches
that have already been applied.

Johan