[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201005095132.GH425362@ulmo>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 11:51:32 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, joro@...tes.org,
vdumpa@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rework tegra_smmu_probe_device()
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 05:22:41PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 02.10.2020 09:08, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> > static int tegra_smmu_of_xlate(struct device *dev,
> > struct of_phandle_args *args)
> > {
> > + struct platform_device *iommu_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(args->np);
> > + struct tegra_mc *mc = platform_get_drvdata(iommu_pdev);
> > u32 id = args->args[0];
> >
> > + of_node_put(args->np);
> > +
> > + if (!mc || !mc->smmu)
> > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> platform_get_drvdata(NULL) will crash.
>
> > + dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, mc->smmu);
>
> I think put_device(mc->dev) is missed here, doesn't it?
Yeah, I think we'd need that here, otherwise we'd be leaking a
reference. Worse, even, mc->dev is the same device that owns the SMMU,
so we're basically incrementing our own reference here and never
releasing it. We also need that put_device(mc->dev) in the error case
above because we already hold the reference there.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists