[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201005095351.GI425362@ulmo>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 11:53:51 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, joro@...tes.org,
vdumpa@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rework tegra_smmu_probe_device()
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 05:50:08PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 02.10.2020 17:22, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> >> static int tegra_smmu_of_xlate(struct device *dev,
> >> struct of_phandle_args *args)
> >> {
> >> + struct platform_device *iommu_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(args->np);
> >> + struct tegra_mc *mc = platform_get_drvdata(iommu_pdev);
> >> u32 id = args->args[0];
> >>
> >> + of_node_put(args->np);
> >> +
> >> + if (!mc || !mc->smmu)
> >> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > platform_get_drvdata(NULL) will crash.
> >
>
> Actually, platform_get_drvdata(NULL) can't happen. I overlooked this.
How so? It's technically possible for the iommus property to reference a
device tree node for which no platform device will ever be created, in
which case of_find_device_by_node() will return NULL. That's very
unlikely and perhaps worth just crashing on to make sure it gets fixed
immediately.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists