[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MItBqjy--3-2@tutanota.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:38:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: ultracoolguy@...anota.com
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc: Marek Behun <kabel@...ckhole.sk>, Pavel <pavel@....cz>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Leds <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: lm3697: Fix out-of-bound access
I understand. So I should leave it like it was and do the rename in another patch?
Oct 5, 2020, 14:33 by dmurphy@...com:
> Marek
>
> On 10/5/20 8:57 AM, ultracoolguy@...anota.com wrote:
>
>> I agree with you.
>>
>> Attached patch with changes.
>>
>
> Nack to the patch.
>
> The subject says it does one thing but you also unnecessarily changed the name of the structure.
>
> Renaming the structure does not fix the underlying issue
>
> Dan
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists