[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <966c3f39-1310-dd60-6f33-0d9464ed2ff1@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 09:41:16 -0500
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To: <ultracoolguy@...anota.com>
CC: Marek Behun <kabel@...ckhole.sk>, Pavel <pavel@....cz>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Leds <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: lm3697: Fix out-of-bound access
Gabriel
On 10/5/20 9:38 AM, ultracoolguy@...anota.com wrote:
> I understand. So I should leave it like it was and do the rename in another patch?
You should do the fix in one patch and leave the structure name alone.
The structure naming if fine and has no benefit and actually will make
it more difficult for others to backport future fixes.
Unless Pavel finds benefit in accepting the structure rename.
Dan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists