[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1869109.WhRmcVd4D2@kreacher>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:01:31 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Simplify sugov_fast_switch()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Drop a redundant local variable definition from sugov_fast_switch()
and rearrange the code in there to avoid the redundant logical
negation.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
The code reads a bit easier after this change IMV.
linux-next material.
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -114,12 +114,8 @@ static bool sugov_update_next_freq(struc
static void sugov_fast_switch(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
unsigned int next_freq)
{
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
-
- if (!sugov_update_next_freq(sg_policy, time, next_freq))
- return;
-
- cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(policy, next_freq);
+ if (sugov_update_next_freq(sg_policy, time, next_freq))
+ cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(sg_policy->policy, next_freq);
}
static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists