[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201007051128.odqiwuex3vqwxumo@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:41:28 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Simplify sugov_fast_switch()
On 06-10-20, 14:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Drop a redundant local variable definition from sugov_fast_switch()
> and rearrange the code in there to avoid the redundant logical
> negation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>
> The code reads a bit easier after this change IMV.
>
> linux-next material.
>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -114,12 +114,8 @@ static bool sugov_update_next_freq(struc
> static void sugov_fast_switch(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
> unsigned int next_freq)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
> -
> - if (!sugov_update_next_freq(sg_policy, time, next_freq))
> - return;
> -
> - cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(policy, next_freq);
> + if (sugov_update_next_freq(sg_policy, time, next_freq))
> + cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(sg_policy->policy, next_freq);
> }
>
> static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists