linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 6 (sound/soc/intel/catpt/device.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3cb00b47-2143-e867-433d-4e8ba026cb90@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 6 Oct 2020 12:35:50 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        moderated for non-subscribers <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 6 (sound/soc/intel/catpt/device.c)

On 10/6/20 11:54 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/6/20 5:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20201002:
>>
> 
> on x86_64 or i386:
> when CONFIG_MODULES is not set/enabled:
> 
> ../sound/soc/intel/catpt/device.c: In function ‘catpt_resume’:
> ../sound/soc/intel/catpt/device.c:84:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘module_is_live’; did you mean ‘module_driver’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   if (!module_is_live(dev->driver->owner)) {
>        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>        module_driver
> 
> 
> You could see
> commit cdb685cb9158fa67f6f4584ea39279ed7ae39253
> Author: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@...ud.ionos.com>
> Date:   Thu May 21 20:59:09 2020 +0200
> 
>     RDMA/rnbd: Fix compilation error when CONFIG_MODULES is disabled
> 
> for a possible fix.
> 

I also just saw this:

WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for DW_DMAC_CORE
  Depends on [n]: DMADEVICES [=n]
  Selected by [y]:
  - SND_SOC_INTEL_CATPT [=y] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && SND_SOC_INTEL_SST_TOPLEVEL [=y] && (ACPI [=n] || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && SND_DMA_SGBUF [=y]

so SND_SOC_INTEL_CATPT should also depend on DMADEVICES.


-- 
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>