[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201007210850.GQ2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:08:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, qais.yousef@....com, swood@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vincent.donnefort@....com,
tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 15/17] sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs rt/dl balancing
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 08:22:44PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> + struct task_struct *curr = class->peek_next_task(rq);
If you look at the core-sched patches they have something very similar
:-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists