[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jhjo8ldmzub.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 23:32:44 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, qais.yousef@....com, swood@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vincent.donnefort@....com,
tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 15/17] sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs rt/dl balancing
On 07/10/20 22:08, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 08:22:44PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> + struct task_struct *curr = class->peek_next_task(rq);
>
> If you look at the core-sched patches they have something very similar
> :-)
Shiny, there's the fair thing I chickened out of doing all prechewed!
I was trying very hard to forget about that series, seems like I did partly
succeed in that :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists