[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201007123544.GA11433@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 13:35:44 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/mprotect: Call arch_validate_prot under mmap_lock
and with length
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 09:39:31AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c
> index 078608ec2e92..b1fabb97d138 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static inline long do_mmap2(unsigned long addr, size_t len,
> {
> long ret = -EINVAL;
>
> - if (!arch_validate_prot(prot, addr))
> + if (!arch_validate_prot(prot, addr, len))
This call isn't under mmap lock. I also find it rather weird as the
generic code only calls arch_validate_prot from mprotect, only powerpc
also calls it from mmap.
This seems to go back to commit ef3d3246a0d0
("powerpc/mm: Add Strong Access Ordering support")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists