[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201007123654.GB11433@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 13:36:54 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Check VMA range in sparc_validate_prot()
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/mman.h
> @@ -60,31 +60,41 @@ static inline int sparc_validate_prot(unsigned long prot, unsigned long addr,
> if (prot & ~(PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC | PROT_SEM | PROT_ADI))
> return 0;
> if (prot & PROT_ADI) {
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma, *next;
> +
I'd split all the ADI logic into a separate, preferable out of line
helper.
> + /* reached the end of the range without errors? */
> + if (addr+len <= vma->vm_end)
missing whitespaces around the arithmetic operator.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists