[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201007151904.20415-1-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 16:19:04 +0100
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-safety@...ts.elisa.tech,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] kernel/sysctl.c: drop unneeded assignment in proc_do_large_bitmap()
The variable 'first' is assigned 0 inside the while loop in the if block
but it is not used in the if block and is only used in the else block.
So, remove the unneeded assignment and move the variable in the else block.
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
---
v1: only had the removal of assignment
The resultant binary stayed same after this change. Verified with
md5sum which remained same with and without this change.
$ md5sum kernel/sysctl.o
77e8b8f3cd9da4446e7f117115c8ba84 kernel/sysctl.o
kernel/sysctl.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index ce75c67572b9..cc274a431d91 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -1423,7 +1423,6 @@ int proc_do_large_bitmap(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
{
int err = 0;
- bool first = 1;
size_t left = *lenp;
unsigned long bitmap_len = table->maxlen;
unsigned long *bitmap = *(unsigned long **) table->data;
@@ -1508,12 +1507,12 @@ int proc_do_large_bitmap(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
}
bitmap_set(tmp_bitmap, val_a, val_b - val_a + 1);
- first = 0;
proc_skip_char(&p, &left, '\n');
}
left += skipped;
} else {
unsigned long bit_a, bit_b = 0;
+ bool first = 1;
while (left) {
bit_a = find_next_bit(bitmap, bitmap_len, bit_b);
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists