lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201007171024.GA3252529@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 12:10:24 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Disable PTM during suspend on Intel PCI bridges

On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 06:53:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 6:49 PM David E. Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Intel Platform Controller Hubs (PCH) since Cannon Lake, the Precision
> > Time Measurement (PTM) capability can prevent PCIe root ports from power
> > gating during suspend-to-idle, causing increased power consumption on
> > systems that suspend using Low Power S0 Idle [1]. The issue is yet to be
> > root caused but believed to be coming from a race condition in the suspend
> > flow as the incidence rate varies for different platforms on Linux but the
> > issue does not occur at all in other operating systems. For now, disable
> > the feature on suspend on all Intel root ports and enable again on resume.
> 
> IMV it should also be noted that there is no particular reason why PTM
> would need to be enabled while the whole system is suspended.  At
> least it doesn't seem to be particularly useful in that state.

Is this a hardware erratum?  If not, and this is working as designed,
it sounds like we'd need to apply this quirk to every device that
supports PTM.  That's not really practical.

The bugzilla says "there is no erratum as this does not affect
Windows," but that doesn't answer the question.  What I want to know
is whether this is a *hardware* defect and whether it will be fixed in
future hardware.

If it's a "wont-fix" hardware issue, we can just disable PTM
completely on Intel hardware and we won't have to worry about it
during suspend.

> > Link: https://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_ACPI_Low_Power_S0_Idle.pdf
> > Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209361
> > Tested-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/quirks.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > index bdf9b52567e0..e82b1f60c7a1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > @@ -5632,3 +5632,60 @@ static void apex_pci_fixup_class(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  }
> >  DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_HEADER(0x1ac1, 0x089a,
> >                                PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, apex_pci_fixup_class);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_PTM
> > +/*
> > + * On Intel Platform Controller Hubs (PCH) since Cannon Lake, the Precision
> > + * Time Measurement (PTM) capability can prevent the PCIe root port from
> > + * power gating during suspend-to-idle, causing increased power consumption.
> > + * So disable the feature on suspend on all Intel root ports and enable
> > + * again on resume.
> > + */
> > +static void quirk_intel_ptm_disable_suspend(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > +       int pos;
> > +       u32 ctrl;
> > +
> > +       if (!(dev->ptm_enabled && dev->ptm_root))
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       pos = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_PTM);
> > +       if (!pos)
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       pci_dbg(dev, "quirk: disabling PTM\n");
> > +
> > +       dev->ptm_enabled = 0;
> > +       dev->ptm_root = 0;
> > +
> > +       pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, &ctrl);
> > +       ctrl &= ~(PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE | PCI_PTM_CTRL_ROOT);
> > +       pci_write_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, ctrl);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void quirk_intel_ptm_enable_resume(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > +       int pos;
> > +       u32 ctrl;
> > +
> > +       pos = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_PTM);
> > +       if (!pos)
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       pci_dbg(dev, "quirk: re-enabling PTM\n");
> > +
> > +       pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, &ctrl);
> > +       ctrl |= PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE | PCI_PTM_CTRL_ROOT;
> > +       pci_write_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, ctrl);
> > +
> > +       dev->ptm_enabled = 1;
> > +       dev->ptm_root = 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_SUSPEND(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID,
> > +                               PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI, 8,
> > +                               quirk_intel_ptm_disable_suspend)
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_RESUME(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID,
> > +                              PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI, 8,
> > +                              quirk_intel_ptm_enable_resume)
> > +#endif
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ