linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: busses: Add support for atomic transfers in Actions Semi Owl driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201008221701.GA72402@BV030612LT>
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 01:17:01 +0300
From:   Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...il.com>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: busses: Add support for atomic transfers in
 Actions Semi Owl driver

Hi Mani, Wolfram,

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:00:10AM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:45:23PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > 
> > > Sure, I can handle this. I assume this should be a separate patch, to
> > > be applied before the current patch. Should I submit a patch series
> > > instead?
> > 
> > Yes, just do it. 
> 
> Sure, I have already clarified this directly with Mani and I'm going
> to handle it soon.

I have just submitted a patch series that incorporates the current
feedback (patches 1 & 2) and an additional improvement (patch 3):

  i2c: owl: Clear NACK and BUS error bits
  i2c: owl: Add support for atomic transfers
  i2c: owl: Enable asynchronous probing

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1602190168.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com/

Thanks,
Cristi