linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Enable addition power management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 01:23:21 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     aford@...conembedded.com, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Enable addition power
 management

On 11/09/2020 14:31, Adam Ford wrote:
> The bandgap sensor can be idled when the processor is too, but it
> isn't currently being done, so the power consumption of OMAP3
> boards can elevated if the bangap sensor is enabled.
> 
> This patch attempts to use some additional power management
> to idle the clock to the bandgap when not needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info> # GTA04
> ---

[ ... ]

> -	/* First thing is to remove sensor interfaces */
> +	cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(&bgp->nb);
> +
> +	/* Remove sensor interfaces */
>  	for (i = 0; i < bgp->conf->sensor_count; i++) {
>  		if (bgp->conf->sensors[i].unregister_cooling)
>  			bgp->conf->sensors[i].unregister_cooling(bgp, i);
> @@ -1150,9 +1167,43 @@ static int ti_bandgap_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, CLK_CTRL))
>  		clk_disable_unprepare(bgp->fclock);
>  
> +	bgp->is_suspended = true;

Is this flag really needed?




-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog