[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201008091225.GV2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:12:25 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/ioapic: Handle Extended Destination ID field in
RTE
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:20:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> @@ -1861,7 +1863,8 @@ static void ioapic_configure_entry(struct irq_data *irqd)
> * ioapic chip to verify that.
> */
> if (irqd->chip == &ioapic_chip) {
> - mpd->entry.dest = cfg->dest_apicid;
> + mpd->entry.dest = cfg->dest_apicid & 0xff;
> + mpd->entry.ext_dest = cfg->dest_apicid >> 8;
> mpd->entry.vector = cfg->vector;
> }
> for_each_irq_pin(entry, mpd->irq_2_pin)
All the other sites did memset(0) before the assignment, and this the
extra unconditional write of 0 to ext_dest is harmless.
This might be true for this site too, but it wasn't immediately obvious.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists