[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB28769233CEC9023E3D9720F9B80B0@DM6PR11MB2876.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 10:36:29 +0000
From: "Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini" <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: "Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai"
<lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@...el.com>,
"Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie"
<wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/4] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add structure device pointer
in probe
Hi Michal,
Thanks for the comment. I replied inline
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 3:35 PM
>To: Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>;
>Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter@...el.com>; michal.simek@...inx.com;
>Shevchenko, Andriy <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>; ulf.hansson@...aro.org;
>linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
>kernel@...r.kernel.org
>Cc: Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@...el.com>;
>Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie
><wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>; arnd@...db.de
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add structure device pointer
>in probe
>
>
>
>On 08. 10. 20 4:09, muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com wrote:
>> From: Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
>>
>> Add struct device *dev in probe func() so that it can widely use in
>> probe to make code more readable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli
>> <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> index f186fbd016b1..46aea6516133 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> @@ -1521,6 +1521,7 @@ static int sdhci_arasan_probe(struct
>platform_device *pdev)
>> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host;
>> struct sdhci_arasan_data *sdhci_arasan;
>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> const struct sdhci_arasan_of_data *data;
>>
>> match = of_match_node(sdhci_arasan_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
>>
>
>This is not what we discussed. You create new variable and you should just use it
>in that function.
>
>s/pdev->dev\./dev->/g
For widely used in future, we plan to put it here and not specific to Keembay function only.
Any comment on this @Andy Shevchenko?
Thanks
>
>Thanks,
>Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists