linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] perf pmu-events: Support event aliasing for system PMUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2ca3d31e-478f-5e0a-dd36-37e84e4abf7c@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Oct 2020 12:49:15 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>,
        "leo.yan@...aro.org" <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" 
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "mathieu.poirier@...aro.org" <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC:     Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "qiangqing.zhang@....com" <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        "james.clark@....com" <james.clark@....com>,
        "linux-imx@....com" <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] perf pmu-events: Support event aliasing for
 system PMUs

On 08/10/2020 12:27, kajoljain wrote:
> Hi John,
>    I am looking into these patches, it seems they are not re-based on top of
> latest Arnaldo's perf/core branch. Can you rebase these changes. I think we are missing
> multiple updates.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Kajol Jain
> 

Hi Kajol Jain,

My thought was that since the kernel part needs acceptance first [0], 
which is based on v5.9-rc7, I would just use the same baseline here.

However I suppose I should still use Arnaldo's perf/core from now on as 
baseline, so I'll look at that now.

Thanks,
John

[0] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1602149181-237415-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com/T/#mc34f758ab72f3d4a90d854b9bda7e6bbb90835b2