[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eem9vsbb.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 14:02:48 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/apic: Support 15 bits of APIC ID in IOAPIC/MSI where available
On Thu, Oct 08 2020 at 13:54, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07 2020 at 13:20, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
>> index 2825e003259c..85206f971284 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
>> @@ -23,8 +23,11 @@
>>
>> struct irq_domain *x86_pci_msi_default_domain __ro_after_init;
>>
>> +int msi_ext_dest_id __ro_after_init;
>
> bool please.
>
> Aside of that this breaks the build for a kernel with CONFIG_PCI_MSI=n
So this wants to be
bool virt_ext_dest_id __ro_after_init;
in apic.c and then please make the IO/APIC places depend on this as well
so any change to the utilization of the reserved IO/APIC bits in the
future is not going to end up in surprises.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists