linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] printk: handle blank console arguments passed in.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201008120535.GA127397@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 8 Oct 2020 21:05:35 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shreyas Joshi <shreyas.joshi@...mp.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        shreyasjoshi15@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: handle blank console arguments passed in.

On (20/10/08 11:01), Petr Mladek wrote:
> 
>   + it is yet another way to affect the amount of messages
>     on console. We already have console_loglevel, ignore_loglevel.

True. Yes, there are "alternative" ways of doing this, but what we
have to face here is - console= has been used for a long time, and
it does, sometimes, bad things that can kill the system. And we,
probably, don't have that many options, we need to "fix" console=
and make it safe, while preserving the behaviour that people are
used to by now. console= is a buggy feature by now.

	-ss