linux-kernel - Re: Bug in herd7 [Was: Re: Litmus test for question from Al Viro]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201008025025.GX29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 19:50:25 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:     Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
        Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>, parri.andrea@...il.com,
        will@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
        npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk,
        dlustig@...dia.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug in herd7 [Was: Re: Litmus test for question from Al Viro]

On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 10:25:37PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:38:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:40:50PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 10:50:40AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > And here is the updated version.
> > > > 
> > > > 							Thanx, Paul
> > > > 
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > commit b7cd60d4b41ad56b32b36b978488f509c4f7e228
> > > > Author: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> > > > Date:   Tue Oct 6 09:38:37 2020 -0700
> > > > 
> > > >     manual/kernel: Add LB+mb+data litmus test
> > > 
> > > Let's change this to:
> > > 
> > >       manual/kernel: Add LB data dependency test with no intermediate variable
> > > 
> > > Without that extra qualification, people reading just the title would
> > > wonder why we need a simple LB litmus test in the archive.
> 
> > I might get this right sooner or later.  You never know.
> > 
> > Like this?
> > 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> Paul, I think you must need new reading glasses.  You completely missed 
> the text above.

There are some distractions at the moment.

Please see below.  If this is not exactly correct, I will use "git rm"
and let you submit the patch as you wish.

						Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit dc0119c24b64f9d541b94ba5d17eec0cbc265bfa
Author: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Date:   Tue Oct 6 09:38:37 2020 -0700

    manual/kernel: Add LB data dependency test with no intermediate variable
    
    Test whether herd7 can detect a data dependency when there is no
    intermediate local variable, as in WRITE_ONCE(*x, READ_ONCE(*y)).
    Commit 0f3f8188a326 in herdtools fixed an oversight which caused such
    dependencies to be missed.
    
    Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>

diff --git a/manual/kernel/C-LB+mb+data.litmus b/manual/kernel/C-LB+mb+data.litmus
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e9e24e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/manual/kernel/C-LB+mb+data.litmus
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+C LB+mb+data
+(*
+ * Result: Never
+ *
+ * Versions of herd7 prior to commit 0f3f8188a326 ("[herd] Fix dependency
+ * definition") recognize data dependencies only when they flow through
+ * an intermediate local variable.  Since the dependency in P1 doesn't,
+ * those versions get the wrong answer for this test.
+ *)
+
+{}
+
+P0(int *x, int *y)
+{
+	int r1;
+
+	r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
+	smp_mb();
+	WRITE_ONCE(*y, r1);
+}
+
+P1(int *x, int *y)
+{
+	WRITE_ONCE(*x, READ_ONCE(*y));
+}
+
+exists (0:r1=1)