[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201008164807.62582e8c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 16:48:07 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] selftests/ftrace: check for do_sys_openat2 in
user-memory test
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 14:25:01 +0100
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> More recent libc implementations are now using openat/openat2 system
> calls so also add do_sys_openat2 to the tracing so that the test
> passes on these systems because do_sys_open may not be called.
>
> Thanks to Masami Hiramatsu for the help on getting this fix to work
> correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Shuah,
Care to take this through your tree?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists