[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1tuv41m8u.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 16:49:17 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Tony Asleson <tasleson@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
pmladek@...e.com, David Lehman <dlehman@...hat.com>,
sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, kbusch@...nel.org, axboe@...com,
sagi@...mberg.me, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, orson.zhai@...soc.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [v5 01/12] struct device: Add function callback durable_name
Greg,
>> > What text is changing? The format of of the prefix of dev_*() is well
>> > known and has been stable for 15+ years now, right? What is difficult
>> > in parsing it?
>>
>> Many of the storage layer messages are using printk, not dev_printk.
>
> Ok, then stop right there. Fix that up. Don't try to route around the
> standard way of displaying log messages by creating a totally different
> way of doing things.
Couldn't agree more!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists